Tech Roundtable VOL. #1 - Which One Seems More Useful as a Secondary Camera: Macro or UltraWide?
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:11 pm

I welcome y'all to the first volume of our Tech Roundtable series. For the first volume, it was damn necessary to have a really debatable topic. And yes, we have it too! Nowadays, since there's a trend of having dual or tri-camera setups in our smartphones, we have two options as our Secondary Camera - An UltraWide and a Macro Camera.
Which One Seems More Useful as a Secondary Camera: UltraWide or Macro?
The UltraWide Wonders



The Macro Camera sees the world in the way most of the other lenses cannot. It sees the tiny details which are incredible! It focuses on the minutiae like the texture of a petal, or the patterns of an insect’s wings. Have a look…The Macro Magic



Getting into the Groove
So… As in the user's perspective, which secondary camera do you think proves to be more useful over the other among the both? For my opinion, I would definitely go with the UltraWide Camera, since I do have a frequent need for a wide-angle FOV, in certain tours and trips. Also, if the UltraWide Camera has good Auto-focusing software optimisations, then with a closer perspective, it can also get us outcomes similar to that of a Macro Camera (not the exact same as Macro Camera, but it works tho). Due to auto focus capabilities we can go near and due to higher resolution we can further crop that image with preserved details. Hence, close capture + further crop makes it a more detailed, macro-like image.
Whereas, the Macro Camera requires a bright yet balanced lighting setup to use its full potential, unlike the UltraWide Camera, which can give decent results in normal light conditions as well. What do your views say? Continue the debate in Comments!
~Tej Dave